Albert Camus' The Stranger

If there is any " justice" in such a conclusion to the book and to the deportment or Meursault, it is only in the most ironic sense. judge in the conventional sense is absent from the book, from the life of Meursault, from the destiny which lead him to kill, from the murder itself certainly (the dead man did non deserve to die), or from the sham of a trial and its dying sentence. And yet, clearly, some change has bewilder to Meursault. Prior to the trial and his finis sentence, Meursault was little more than a human leaf pursy to and fro by the wind of circumstance, from his mother's death to his murder of the man on the beach. He felt little, if anything, aside from passing pleasure, and had little lust or capacity to secure conscious decisions to better his life. much(prenominal) aimlessness led to his murder of the man.

Nevertheless, during the trial and afterward, Meursault shows that he has play along to accept his place in the world, has come to accept the world, and has come point to accept his imminent execution. However, the nature of this acceptance appears ironic, b arly because what he is accepting makes no sense whatsoever. However, that is what gives the character of Meursault its finicky quality -- he is able to accept something which he does non make. In fact, he not only accepts it, he embraces it -- even unto

If life itself does not make sense, if life itself is unjust (in that every person does not understand his or her life and is also under a "death penalty"), then why should a man's trial for an cabalistic murder make sense and be just? In fact, it does not. At the same time, that life, murder trial, and death sentence is altogether that Meursault's life is. If he chooses to accept the unacceptable, he may ne'er understand, but at least he has reality. If he does not accept it, he has nothing. This situation is both ironic, and, from the existentialist's perspective, absurd.

death.

He is animated for the first time in his life, precisely because he is confront death. His life has been so lifeless that only in the acquaint of death does he see life clearly for what it is -- in alone its absurdity.

Camus, Alfred. The Stranger. New York: Knopf, 1988.

The irony of the "funny" observation is that it adds to the standoff of Meursault's predicament -- from the reader's perspective.

Camus may be saying that we ar all in Meursault's predicament, whether we know it or not. Although most of us are not murderers, we are all blown to and fro semi-consciously by forces beyond our control, we do not fully know why we are here, and we are all under a death sentence, whether we are guilty or not, whether we have competent representation or not.

Again, this irony, at the end of the book, focuses on the injustice of the trial. He has been essentially found guilty by a kangaroo court and with completely incompetent legal representation, but his alienated character electrostatic has not accepted his reality. For example, here he reflects on the doohickey which will take his
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.